CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

 

TO:                             Mayor and City Commission

 

FROM:                       Richard D. Sala, City Manager

 

BY:                              Tammy Reed-Holguin, Community Development Director

 

DATE:                        December 11, 2007

 

SUBJECT:                 VAR- 07-01    Granada (Delegal Plat)

State Road 7 and McNab Road Extension

 

Second Reading

                                    To grant various variances from the City of North Lauderdale Code of Ordinances to facilitate the development of Granada, a mixed-use project consisting of residential and commercial components.

 

APPLICANT: Altman Development Corp

 

The applicant in conjunction with United Homes is proposing to build 220 residential units and up to 10, 000 square feet of commercial use on State Road 7 and McNab Road extension within a proposed Planned Unit Development. In order to accommodate the development, the applicant is requesting a variance from the City setbacks, open space and parking requirements.  The request is outlined in the table below:

 

TYPE OF VARIANCE

CODE REQUIREMENTS

PROPOSED

VARIANCE REQUESTED

Section 106-350 (c) (4)

Setback abutting a traffic way (State Road 7)

50 feet

26.8 feet

23.2 feet

Section 106-350 (k)

Open Space

35 % of Gross Site Area

28%

7%

Section 106-223 (a)(3)

Parking Space

508 Total Parking Spaces

414 Total Parking Spaces

94 Total Parking Spaces

 


 

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

 

1.                  Setbacks. Section 106-350 (c) (4) of the City Code requires setback or yard of not less than 50 feet in depth abutting a trafficway in a Planned Unit Development. According to the site plan, 26.8 feet setback is being proposed along State Road 7 parallel to the commercial area of the project. It should be noted that the reduction will provide a more pedestrian friendly commercial environment, since the commercial area is a part of the Redevelopment District identified by the City.

 

2.                  Open Space. Section 106-350 (k) of the City Code requires a Planned Unit Development to provide at least 35 percent of gross area open space. To facilitate the increased density the applicant has proposed 28 percent open space and is requesting a 7% variance. This reduction will allow the developer to provide on site amenities such as a clubhouse with a pool. This request will enable the reasonable use of this property and it would not be injurious the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 

 

3.                  Parking Space. Section 106-223 (a) (3) of the City Code requires 508 parking spaces, based on the number of bedrooms. The applicant is proposing 132 spaces for the one bedroom, 264 spaces for the two bedrooms, 66 spaces for the three bedrooms. The site plan has incorporated garages among the parking spaces and 46 guests parking. A total 414 parking spaces is been proposed and the applicant is requesting a variance for 94 parking spaces, in order to accommodate the mix use development along the 441 corridor.

 

Per the guidelines and criteria contained in Section 106-79 of the City Code, a variance shall not be granted unless the City’s governing body determines the following:

1.                  That special circumstances exist affecting the land involved preventing the reasonable use of such land.

2.                  That the circumstances, which cause the hardship, are peculiar to the property, such that they clearly constitute marked exceptions to other properties in the district.

3.                  That the hardship is not an economical hardship.

4.                  That the hardship is not self-created.

5.                  That the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. 

 

Staff has reviewed the application in light of the guidelines and criteria listed above and determined that it reasonably meets the guidelines established for granting a variance, and will enable the reasonable use of this property.  This determination is based upon the following facts.

 

·        The development will provide a stable, rental residential community as an anchor and potential catalyst for redevelopment of the older surrounding areas. The project also will further accomplish Objective 1 of the City’s Future Land Use Plan Element, which is “to achieve and maintain a stable and diversified mixture of land uses by attracting infill development including residential, non-residential and community facilities to achieve build out of the currently vacant parcels by 2010”

·        There is no economic hardship, since the applicant is willing to make any necessary provisions requested by the City.

·        The need for the variances is not a self-created hardship but rather a necessity to accommodate the structure. The area to be developed is surrounded by major roadways, which makes it difficult for the applicant to build a high density project without incurring some variances.

·        The proposed project would not be injurious to the adjacent development, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The proposed variances allow the applicant to provide future residents a better pedestrian friendly community with amenities including sidewalks, swimming pool, playground and clubhouse. The applicant is incorporating the request of the City to provide a mix-use development and in order to accomplish this request the variances are needed.

 

Taking into consideration the location and unusually shape of the parcel of land of the proposed development, staff is confident that the hardship is not self-created, and is not an economic hardship.

 

The Planning and Zoning Board (P&Z) meeting was held on November 15, 2007 and after staff presentation and public hearing, the Board unanimously recommended approval of the requested variances. 

 

The City Commission unanimously approved first reading of the ordinance granting the variances on November 29, 2007.  There was discussion on the parking variance prior to approval.  The applicant confirmed that the declaration of restrictive covenants will include language to govern parking.  Vehicles such as boats, recreational vehicles (RV’s) and trailers will not be allowed and an excessive number of cars per household will also be prohibited through language in the leases.  The City Commission approved the parking variance with the assurance that the declaration of restrictive covenants will contain these provisions. We are presenting the second reading of the ordinance tonight for your consideration and approval.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Commission’s approval of the final reading of the attached ordinance granting the proposed variances subject to the DRC comments, P&Z Board comments/recommendation and conditions listed below.

 

1.                  That all applicable approvals by the City, County, State and other regulatory agencies be provided to the City of North Lauderdale prior to the issuance of permits.

 

2.                  That approval of the requested variances is contingent upon platting, rezoning, and land use amendment approval.

 

3.                  That the parking variance was approved with the assurance that the declaration of restrictive covenants will contain provisions prohibiting boats, recreational vehicles (RV’s) and trailers and limiting the number of cars per household. 

 

If the City Commission concurs with this request, the following motion is in order:

 

“Motion to approve the second and final reading of the attached ordinance to grant various variances from the City of North Lauderdale Code of Ordinances to facilitate the development of the Granada, a mixed use project, consisting of residential and commercial components located along State Road 7”.

 


 

 

ORDINANCE NO. __________

 

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM THE NORTH LAUDERDALE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PERMIT THE 26.8 FEET SETBACK ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUILDING NUMBER 3 AND 5 ABUTTING THE TRAFFICWAY ON STATE ROAD 7, AS OPPOSED TO THE 50 FEET REQUIREMENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBJECT SECTION 106-350 (c)(4); TO PERMIT 28% OPEN SPACE OF THE GROSS SITE AREA, AS OPPOSED TO THE 35%  OF THE GROSS SITE AREA REQUIREMENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBJECT SECTION 106-350 (k); TO PERMIT 414 PARKING SPACES, AS OPPOSED TO THE 508 PARKING SPACES REQUIREMENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBJECT SECTION 106-223 (a) (3); NORTH LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR STIPULATIONS AND CONDITIONS; PROVIDING THAT PROVISIONS NOT VARIED BY THIS ORDINANCE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

 

            WHEREAS, Section106-350 (c) (4) of the City Code requires a minimum 50 feet setback on the side abutting a trafficway; and

 

WHEREAS, Altman Development Corporation, developer of said property, has applied for a variance to allow the 26.8 feet setback on the west side of building #1 and building #5  abutting the State Road 7 trafficway; and

            WHEREAS, Section 106-350 (k), of the City Code requires 35% open space of gross site area; and

 

WHEREAS, Altman Development Corporation, developer of said property, has applied for a variance to allow 28% open space; and

 

            WHEREAS, Section 106-223 (a) (3), of the City Code requires 508 parking spaces based on the number of bedrooms; and

 

WHEREAS, Altman Development Corporation, developer of said property, has applied for a variance to allow 414 parking spaces; and

 

            WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board has voted to recommend the approval of said variance requests; and

 

            WHEREAS, the City Commission is desirous of granting the requested variance from the requirements of the aforecited Ordinance and associated Zoning Regulations and/or applicable provisions thereof to said legal titleholder(s) as they apply to the property in question.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA:

 

Section 1:         That pursuant to an application properly filed for a variance from the requirements of, Section 106-350 (c) (4), Section 106-350 (k) and Section 106-223 (a) (3) of the North Lauderdale Code, variances be and the same are hereby granted from the requirements for the development located at East side of State Road 7 and McNab Road Extension, North Lauderdale, Florida

 

                        Section 2:         That the petition for a variance filed by Altman Development Corporation developer of said property is hereby granted to Granada, the same to inure to the benefit of the present and future titleholder(s) to said property.

 

                        Section 3:         That all other requirements of the North Lauderdale Code of Ordinances and associated zoning regulations are not otherwise varied by the terms of this Ordinance and shall be in full force and effect and full applicable to the property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance to the legal title holders thereof.

 

                        Section 4:         That all Ordinances, or parts of Ordinances, Resolutions or parts of Resolutions, in conflict herewith be and the same are repealed to the extent of such conflict.

 

                        Section 5:         That this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

 

PASSED on first reading by the City Commission of the City of North Lauderdale, Florida, this __ day of  ____________, 2007.

 

PASSED and ADOPTED on second reading by the City Commission of the City of North Lauderdale, Florida, this  _______ day of __________ 2007.

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

 

                                                                       

CITY ATTORNEY SAMUEL S. GOREN

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                    MAYOR JACK BRADY

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                    VICE MAYOR JOHN R. CANGEMI

 

ATTEST:

 

                                                                        ____

INTERIM CITY CLERK PATRICIA VANCHERI